Most rejected pitches are not rejected because the writing is weak. They are rejected because they contain a topic rather than an idea.
- Pitch an idea, not a topic: state an argument, angle, and why it matters now.
- Keep emails 100 to 200 words with headline subject, one-line context, argument, reporting plan, logistics, and two relevant clips.
- Write the subject line as the headline you want on the finished piece, prefixed with "Pitch:".
- Do not attach files; include two or three links only, and close by making replying easy.
- Follow up once after about a week, include a soft deadline in your pitch, then move on if no reply.
“Would you be interested in a feature about how Gen Z is golf’s newest target market?” is a topic. It names a subject and asks a question. An editor reading it has no idea what the story actually is, who you would speak to, or why it should run now.
Turning topics into ideas is the whole skill. Below are 15 templates covering the situations freelancers and PR professionals actually encounter, plus the rules that make any of them work.
Topic vs Idea
A topic names a subject. An idea contains a claim, an angle, and a reason to publish it now.
Topic: “A piece about remote work and burnout.”
Idea: “Four-day weeks were meant to fix burnout. Three UK companies that adopted them in 2023 have quietly reverted, and HR leads at two of them say compressed schedules made things worse. I’d interview all three plus an occupational psychologist. 1,400 words, filed in three weeks.”
The second version tells the editor what the story argues, where the reporting comes from, how long it runs, and when it lands. It is also much harder to hand to someone else, which incidentally solves the “an editor stole my idea” problem — a topic has nothing in it to steal.
Anatomy of a Pitch
Keep it to roughly 100 to 200 words containing:
- A subject line that names the story, not the transaction
- One line of context — who you are, or why you specifically
- The idea, stated as an argument
- Your reporting plan — who or what you would draw on
- Practicalities — length, section, timing
- Two or three links to relevant clips
- A close that makes replying easy
Do not attach anything. Editors rarely open attachments, and some spam filters treat them unkindly. Links only.
Subject Lines That Work
Pitch: Why three UK four-day-week pilots quietly revertedPitch for [Section]: [Headline as you'd run it]Timely pitch: [Topic], can file by ThursdayFollowing up: [previous subject line]
Write the subject line as the headline you would want on the finished piece. If it does not sound like something the publication would run, the pitch is not ready.
Cold Pitches
1. Standard cold pitch with clips
Subject: Pitch: The quiet reversal of the four-day week
Hi [Name],
I’m a freelance journalist covering workplace policy, and I read your piece on hybrid mandates last month.
Three UK companies that adopted four-day weeks in 2023 have reverted this year. HR leads at two of them told me compressed schedules increased burnout rather than reducing it — the opposite of the intended effect.
I’d interview all three companies plus an occupational psychologist on why compression backfires. Around 1,400 words for [Section], filed within three weeks.
Recent work: [link], [link]
If this isn’t right, I’m happy to hear that too.
Best, [Name] — [portfolio link]
2. No published clips yet
Hi [Name],
I’ve spent six years as a paediatric nurse and want to write about something I see weekly and never read about: parents arriving at A&E because they cannot get a GP appointment for a child under five.
I’d frame it around three families over one shift, with data from [source] on under-five appointment availability.
I haven’t published in a national title yet, but I’ve written [link] and can send a full draft on spec if that’s easier for you.
Offering to write on spec removes the editor’s risk. Use it when you have expertise but no track record.
3. Timely news hook
Subject: Timely pitch — can file Thursday
Hi [Name],
[Event] happened this morning. The angle nobody has covered yet is [angle], and I’ve already spoken to [source type] who will go on record.
800 words, filed by Thursday midday. Happy to move faster if you need it.
4. Leading with specialist expertise
Hi [Name],
I’m a [credential] and I think [publication] is missing something on [subject].
[One-sentence argument grounded in your expertise.]
I can bring reporting most freelancers cannot, because [specific access or knowledge]. Around [length] for [section].
5. Personal essay
Hi [Name],
In [year] I [specific experience]. What I learned is [the argument the essay makes] — which runs counter to how this is usually written about.
The essay would open with [scene] and close on [turn]. Around 1,200 words.
Essays like this only work if the writing carries them, so here are two examples: [link], [link]
Following Up and Re-pitching
6. First follow-up
Subject: Following up: [original subject]
Hi [Name],
Checking in on the pitch below. If it’s not right for you, no problem at all — I’ll place it elsewhere.
[Original pitch pasted underneath]
One follow-up after roughly a week. Then stop.
7. Re-pitch after a rejection
Hi [Name],
You passed on [previous idea] in March — completely fair. You mentioned you were looking for more [X], so here’s one closer to that.
[New pitch, three sentences.]
Referencing the earlier exchange shows you listened, which puts you ahead of most people in the inbox.
8. Pitching an editor who has published you
Hi [Name],
[Previous piece] did well — thanks again for taking it.
Next idea: [two sentences]. Same length, could file by [date].
Established relationships earn brevity. Do not pad it.
9. Responding to an open call
Subject: [Publication] open call — [your angle]
Hi [Name],
Responding to your call for [category] pitches with a deadline of [date].
[The idea in two sentences.] [Why you’re placed to write it.] [Length and timing.]
Clips: [link], [link]
Follow their stated format exactly. Open calls are where guideline-following is most visible and most tested.
10. Warm introduction or event follow-up
Hi [Name],
We spoke at [event] about [thing]. You mentioned [detail] — that stuck with me.
Here’s an idea along those lines: [two sentences].
Other Pitch Types
11. Guest post pitch
Hi [Name],
I’ve read [publication]’s coverage of [topic] and noticed you haven’t covered [specific gap].
I’d write [title] — [one line on the argument]. It would include [original element: data, case study, framework].
No links in the body beyond one to [relevant resource], and I’d write to your guidelines.
Naming the gap beats offering to write about a subject they already cover well.
12. Offering an expert source (PR)
Hi [Name],
You’ve covered [subject] twice this quarter. If you return to it, [Name], [title] at [company], can speak to [specific angle] and has [specific data or access].
Available this week, no prep needed. Happy to send background if useful.
Offer a source and an angle, not a company announcement.
13. Pitching a column or series
Hi [Name],
I’d like to propose a monthly column on [subject] for [section].
Three sample instalments: [one line each].
I can commit to [frequency] and have been writing on this for [duration]: [link], [link]
14. Trade or B2B publication
Hi [Name],
[Practitioners in sector] are dealing with [specific operational problem] following [change]. Nobody has written the practical version of this.
I’d cover [what it would contain], drawing on [sources]. Around [length].
Trade editors want usefulness over narrative. Lead with the practical value.
15. Original data or research
Hi [Name],
We surveyed [n] [respondent type] on [subject]. The headline finding is [number], which contradicts [received wisdom].
Full methodology and dataset available, exclusive to you for [period]. I can write it up or hand it over — whichever you prefer.
Original data is the strongest cold pitch available, because it is genuinely exclusive.
Mistakes That Get You Deleted
- Pitching a topic instead of an idea. The most common failure by far.
- Not reading the publication. Pitching something they ran six weeks ago ends the conversation.
- Ignoring submission guidelines. Guidelines exist partly to filter out people who do not read.
- Writing 800 words to propose a 700-word article.
- Attaching files. Links only.
- “Dear Editor.” Find the name. It takes two minutes.
- Following up four times. Once is professional. Repeatedly is not.
Follow-Up Etiquette
Include a soft deadline in the original pitch — a line saying that if you have not heard back by a given date you will assume it is a no and place the idea elsewhere. Editors have said they appreciate this: it removes the obligation to send a rejection and sets expectations on both sides.
Otherwise, follow up once after about a week, then move on. Editorial inboxes are genuinely overwhelmed, and silence is usually workload rather than judgement.
Track What You Send
Keep a simple record: publication, editor, date, idea, outcome. After thirty pitches you will see which angles land, which publications reply, and how long each takes. That pattern is worth more than any template, including these.
Final Thoughts
A good pitch is short, specific, and easy to say yes to. It contains an argument rather than a subject, names the reporting behind it, and tells the editor exactly what they would be commissioning.
Write the headline first. If it does not sound like something the publication would run, the problem is the idea, not the email.
FAQs
How long should a pitch to an editor be?
Around 100 to 200 words. Never longer than the piece you are proposing to write.
What should the subject line say?
Write it as the headline you would want on the published piece, prefixed with “Pitch:” so it is easy to file.
Should I attach my resume or writing samples?
No. Editors rarely open attachments. Include two or three links to relevant published work instead.
How long should I wait before following up?
About a week, then follow up once. If there is still no reply, place the idea elsewhere.
Can I pitch the same idea to several publications?
Pitch one at a time for exclusives, or state clearly that it is a simultaneous submission. Never let two editors commission the same piece unknowingly.







